WEEMS v. HICKMAN

No. 87-36.

524 So.2d 792 (1988)

William A. WEEMS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jesse HICKMAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

February 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kelly & Salim, Michael I. Murphy, Natchitoches, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Plauche, Smith & Nieset, Frank M. Walker, Jr., Lake Charles, Watson, Murchison, William P. Crews, Jr., Natchitoches, Michael W. Fontenot, Lafayette, defendants-appellees.

Before GUIDRY and YELVERTON, JJ., and SWIFT, J. Pro Tem.


G. WILLIAM SWIFT, Jr., Judge Pro Tem.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court was correct in finding there was no issue of material fact regarding the employment status of plaintiff with two defendants in the action and granting a summary judgment in favor of such defendants and one's insurer.

This is a tort action instituted by the plaintiff, William A. Weems, seeking damages for personal injuries received on December...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases