1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 842 F.2d
  5. 842 F.2d 466 (1988)
 

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASS'N v. U.S. R.R. RETIRE. BD.

No. 86-1333.

842 F.2d 466 (1988)

RAILWAY LABOR EXECUTIVES' ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. U.S. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 25, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Birney, for petitioner. William G. Mahoney and Thomas P. Murphy, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner.

Karl T. Blank, Gen. Atty., Railroad Retirement Bd., with whom Steven A. Bartholow, Deputy Gen. Counsel and Edward S. Hintzke, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Railroad Retirement Bd., Chicago, Ill., were on the brief for respondent.

Daniel Joseph and David A. Holzworth, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for amicus curiae Government of Canada urging reversal.

Before STARR and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges, and McGOWAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge STARR.

STARR, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us a second time. The Railway Labor Executives' Association, a voluntary association which represents organized rail employees in the United States and Canada, once again raises issues pertaining to the impact of two federal statutes on Canadian employees of U.S. railroads operating in Canada. The Railroad Retirement Board (Board) determined that the Railroad Retirement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases