1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 205 Cal.App.3d
  5. 205 Cal.App.3d 1089 (1988)
 

AMERICAN NAT. BANK v. STANFILL

Docket Nos. F008513, F008696.

205 Cal.App.3d 1089 (1988)

252 Cal. Rptr. 861

AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARY L. STANFILL et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

November 9, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Fachin, McCartney & Twisselman, N. Thomas McCartney, Klein, Wegis & Duggan, Barry L. Goldner, David J. Cooper, Moore, Clifford, Wolfe, Larson & Trutner and Elizabeth Williams for Defendants and Appellants.

Young, Wooldridge, Paulden, Self, Farr & Griffin, David F. Rodriguez and Robert J. Self for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

SARKISIAN, J.* —

INTRODUCTION

Appellants Gary Stanfill and James Nelson file separate appeals from a judgment in favor of American National Bank and against appellants following the granting of the bank's motion for summary judgment. Appellants seek reversal of the judgment enforcing appellants' obligations as makers of a promissory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases