1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 517 So.2d
  5. 517 So.2d 775 (1988)
 

LOUIS BENITO ADVERTISING, INC. v. BROWN

No. 86-2932.

517 So.2d 775 (1988)

LOUIS BENITO ADVERTISING, INC., Appellant, v. Richard L. BROWN and Walter L. Copeland, Individually and As Partners Doing Business As Brown & Copeland, and Individually and As Partners Doing Business As Coopers & Lybrand, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 6, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee S. Damsker, of Maney, Damsker & Arledge, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Mike Piscitelli, of Stagg, Hardy & Yerrid, P.A., Tampa, for Louis Benito.

William C. Humphreys, Jr. and Todd S. Fairchild, of Alston & Bird, Atlanta, Ga., and Marvin E. Barkin, of Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Barkin, Frye & O'Neill, Tampa, for appellee Richard L. Brown and for Coopers & Lybrand.

Robert E. Morris, of Morris & Rosen, P.A., Tampa, for appellee Walter L. Copeland.

SCHEB, Judge.

Is it necessary for a plaintiff to name all partners as defendants in a suit against a partnership when only seeking a judgment enforceable against the assets of the partnership?

Plaintiff, Louis Benito Advertising, Inc., filed a professional malpractice action against Coopers & Lybrand, an accounting firm, and Richard L. Brown and over 200 other individuals alleged to be partners. After Brown was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases