Francis V. GEDDES, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAM, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Respondents.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued April 25, 1988.
Decided July 15, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Bernard J. DiMuro, with whom Stephen A. Katz, Alexandria, Va., was on the brief, for petitioner.
John Jeffrey Ross, Atty., Dept. of Labor, with whom Donald S. Shire, Associate Sol., and J. Michael O'Neill, Counsel for Longshore, Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for respondent, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Program, U.S. Dept. of Labor, arguing in favor, of petitioner.
John F. Ward, Washington, D.C., for respondent, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Before BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges, and PALMIERI Senior District Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
PER CURIAM:
This case was previously before us in Geddes v. Benefits Review Board,735 F.2d 1412 (D.C.Cir.1984) (Geddes I) on petition to review the Board's denial of Geddes' claimed benefits under section 49 of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act ("the Act"). 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-50 (1976). At that time, we found that the Board failed to apply the correct...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
