1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 538 A.2d
  5. 538 A.2d 742 (1988)
 

IN RE GILBERT

No. 86-1614.

538 A.2d 742 (1988)

In re James H. GILBERT, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 7, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Epstein, with whom R. Hale Foote, Washington, D.C., was on the response to the order to show cause, for respondent.

Fern Flanagan, Asst. Bar Counsel at the time this case was argued, with whom Thomas E. Flynn, Bar Counsel, and Wallace E. Shipp, Jr., Deputy Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the reply to the response of respondent to the show cause order, for petitioner, the Office of Bar Counsel.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEWMAN and BELSON, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this professional responsibility case, we must determine whether respondent James H. Gilbert should be reciprocally disciplined in this jurisdiction, pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 18(5), as a consequence of his disbarment by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on October 6, 1986. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Gilbert, 307 Md. 481, 515 A.2d 454 (1986...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases