1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 419 N.W.2d
  5. 419 N.W.2d 855 (1988)
 

MECHURA v. McQUILLAN

No. CO-87-1365.

419 N.W.2d 855 (1988)

Ronald J. MECHURA, Respondent, v. Jeanne M. McQUILLAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 8, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Eisenzimmer, Meier, Kennedy & Quinn, St. Paul, for respondent.

Arvid W. Rydholm, Callinan, Raidt & Rydholm, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by SEDGWICK, P.J., and RANDALL and KALITOWSKI, JJ.

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

This appeal is from a trial court judgment holding appellant has no legal or equitable interest in the property at issue because no written contract existed between appellant and respondent pursuant to Minnesota cohabitation statutes. See Minn.Stat. §§ 513.075 and 513.076 (1986). Because no written contract exists, all claims by appellant are barred by the cohabitation statutes. Affirmed.

FACTS

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases