1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 366 S.E.2d
  5. 366 S.E.2d 907 (1988)
 

PROCESS COMPONENTS v. BALTIMORE AIRCOIL

No. 8726SC1058.

366 S.E.2d 907 (1988)

PROCESS COMPONENTS, INC. v. BALTIMORE AIRCOIL CO., INC.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

April 19, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Acton, Jr. and Frank B. Aycock, III, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Moore & Van Allen by Charles E. Johnson, Holly J. Hickman and Robert J. Greene, Jr., Charlotte, for defendant.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Liberally construing defendant's brief, it seems defendant contends the trial court erred in denying its motion for directed verdict because plaintiff had not proved damages. In order to recover damages for lost profits, an injured plaintiff must prove its losses with reasonable certainty. Olivetti Corp. v. Ames Business Systems, Inc., 319 N.C. 534, 356 S.E.2d 578 (1987...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases