1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 519 N.E.2d
  5. 519 N.E.2d 752 (1988)
 

TINSLEY v. PLUMMER

No. 49A02-8607-JV-265.

519 N.E.2d 752 (1988)

David TINSLEY, Sr., Appellant (Respondent below), v. Richard and Kathy PLUMMER, Appellees (Petitioners below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Second District.

March 2, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Beatty, Landman & Beatty, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Daniel J. Coffey, Indianapolis, for appellees.

SHIELDS, Presiding Judge.

David Tinsley, Sr. appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Richard and Kathy Plummer visitation rights with his son, David Tinsley, Jr. and denying him attorney fees.

We reverse in part and affirm in part.

ISSUE

The issues on appeal are:

1. Do the Plummers have a legally cognizable right to seek visitation with David;

2. If so, did the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases