1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 205 Cal.App.3d
  5. 205 Cal.App.3d 1065 (1988)
 

PEOPLE v. SHIELDS

Docket No. B035623.

205 Cal.App.3d 1065 (1988)

252 Cal. Rptr. 849

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARK ARTHUR SHIELDS, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

November 9, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Whipple, Viele & Mays, Whipple & Viele and Edward A. Whipple for Defendant and Appellant.

Michael D. Bradbury, District Attorney, and Michael D. Schwartz, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

STONE (S.J.), P.J.

(1a) Does an employer's consent to a warrantless search of its premises eliminate the requirement that the police have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity of an employee before he may be detained and questioned? We hold it does not. Employers have the right to consent to a police search for drugs on their premises, but authorities may not detain an employee without at least a reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases