HEDGMAN v. HACKERS' LICENSE APPEAL BD.

No. 86-1692.

549 A.2d 720 (1988)

Rudolph L. HEDGMAN, Jr., Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HACKERS' LICENSE APPEAL BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided November 4, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudolph L. Hedgman, Jr., pro se.

Victor E. Long, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom James R. Murphy, Acting Corp. Counsel, at the time the brief was filed, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, and Lutz Alexander Prager, Asst. Deputy Corp. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before MACK and FERREN, Associate Judges, and REILLY, Senior Judge.


REILLY, Senior Judge.

Petitioner challenges a decision by the Hackers' License Appeal Board ("Board") revoking his license to operate a cab for a period of six months because it found him in violation of certain taxicab regulations.1 As the record discloses that the agency action did not conform to the requirements of the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, D.C.Code §§ 1-1501-20 (1987), we reverse and remand.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases