TUCKNER v. MAY TP.

No. C9-87-1915.

419 N.W.2d 836 (1988)

Richard TUCKNER, et al., Appellants, v. TOWNSHIP OF MAY and Washington County, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 1, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David K. Hebert, Jergens Hebert Welch & Humphreys, Forest Lake, for appellants.

Richard M. Arney, Washington County Atty., Howard R. Turrentine, Asst. Co. Atty., Stillwater, for respondents.

Considered and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and PARKER and MULALLY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court's judgment affirming a decision of the Washington County Board of Adjustment and Appeals (the Board), which denied appellants Richard and June Tuckner's request for a variance. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants own Lots 74, 75, 76, and 77, Block 2, Carnelian Hills, which are contiguous parcels of land situated on Big Carnelian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases