PETRICH v. DYKE

No. C4-87-1904.

419 N.W.2d 833 (1988)

William G. PETRICH, d/b/a Petrich Insulation, Inc., Respondent, v. Bob DYKE, individually and Bernhart Construction, Inc., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 1, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P. James Taurinskas, South St. Paul, for respondent.

Richard A. Grayson, St. Paul, for appellants.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and HUSPENI and SCHUMACHER, J., without oral argument.


OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in refusing to vacate a default judgment entered after defendant (now appellant) failed to respond to some of plaintiff's (now respondent's) requests for discovery.

FACTS

Respondent William Petrich brought suit against appellant Bob Dyke and Bernhart Construction, Inc. for payment for insulation services.

Petrich claims that after he filed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases