REINSURANCE ASS'N OF MINN. v. SCHUMACHER

No. CX-87-1809.

419 N.W.2d 826 (1988)

REINSURANCE ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Kenneth W. SCHUMACHER, Edward J. Tentis, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 1, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Parrington, Steven D. Ostlie, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Robert R. Dunlap, Rochester, David A. Stofferahn, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Heard, considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and NIERENGARTEN and CRIPPEN, JJ.


OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Reinsurance Association of Minnesota ("RAM") brought a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that respondent/employee Edward Tentis was not insured for workers' compensation under the RAM policy held by respondent/employer Kenneth Schumacher. The trial court denied RAM's motion, ruling as a matter of law that RAM was required to indemnify Schumacher for all benefits due Tentis under the Workers' Compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases