1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 693 F.Supp.
  5. 693 F.Supp. 547 (1988)
 

NIXON v. CELOTEX CORP.

No. G85-628 CA.

693 F.Supp. 547 (1988)

Donald NIXON and Claire Nixon, Plaintiffs, v. The CELOTEX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.

March 4, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Parmenter, Forsythe, Rude, Van Epps, Briggs & Fauri by Arthur M. Rude, Muskegon, Mich. (Bergevin and Goodman, Dennis J. Bergevin, of counsel), Bay City, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt, & Howlett, Richard Kay, Myra Willis, Grand Rapids, Mich., for defendants.

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

Donald Nixon is a former sales representative of The Celotex Corporation ("Celotex") who was discharged by the company during a "reduction in force." The reduction was allegedly the result of economic conditions that required the company to consolidate its sales staff. After his discharge, Nixon filed a charge with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights ("MDCR") and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases