1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 202 Cal.App.3d
  5. 202 Cal.App.3d 1033 (1988)
 

SANGSTER v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BD.

Docket No. B022218.

202 Cal.App.3d 1033 (1988)

249 Cal. Rptr. 235

ROBERT E. SANGSTER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA HORSE RACING BOARD, Defendant and Respondent; WILLIAM GUMPERT et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

July 13, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Craigo & Zimmermann, Richard W. Craigo and Scott Z. Zimmermann for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Henry G. Ullerich, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Robert Forgnone for Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

OPINION

WOODS, P.J.

Appellant Robert E. Sangster (Sangster) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. Respondents are the California Horse Racing Board (the Board), and William Gumpert and others (Gumpert) who were the real parties in interest in the proceedings below.

(1) (See fn. 1.) The facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases