1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 197 Cal.App.3d
  5. 197 Cal.App.3d 1037 (1988)
 

PITMAN v. CITY OF OAKLAND

Docket No. A034137.

197 Cal.App.3d 1037 (1988)

243 Cal. Rptr. 306

JOHN B. PITMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

January 21, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Vincent A. Harrington, Jr., and Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard G. Tullis, Deputy Attorney General, Richard E. Winnie, City Attorney, and Mark B. Shragge for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BENSON, J.

This appeal follows an order of the trial court dismissing the plaintiff's complaint. A demurrer to the first cause of action was sustained without leave to amend. Demurrers to the second, third and fourth causes of action were sustained with 10 days leave to amend. Upon plaintiff's failure to amend, the action was dismissed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Plaintiff's complaint alleged that plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases