PEAT MARWICK v. DEPT OF FIN


139 Misc.2d 1093 (1988)

In the Matter of Peat Marwick Main & Co., Petitioner, v. New York City Department of Finance et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

June 15, 1988


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hutton & Solomon for petitioner. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel, for respondents.


EDWARD H. LEHNER, J.

The issue here is whether sums paid pursuant to an agreement between Peat Marwick Main & Co. (petitioner) and the operator of Madison Square Garden (the Garden) providing for petitioner's exclusive use of a luxury box (the box) in the Garden should be deemed "rent" for the purposes of the New York City commercial rent or occupancy tax (the tax). The court holds that such payments are not rent, and therefore the tax is inapplicable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases