STATE v. MAURO

10-85-09703; CA A41727.

757 P.2d 454 (1988)

92 Or.App. 194

STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. James Thomas MAURO, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 20, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kendall M. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Jay W. Frank, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Moule & Frank, Eugene.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


NEWMAN, Judge.

The state appeals defendant's judgment for indemnity, ORS 33.110, which the court granted after it held the state in contempt for wilful violation of its order to return defendant's car and scale. The state assigns as errors that the court found that the state was in wilful contempt and awarded judgment to defendant.1 We reverse.

On July 30, 1985, Eugene police searched defendant's home pursuant to a warrant and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases