Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the fine imposed on each of the defendant's 19 convictions under the Agriculture and Markets Law from $250 for each count to $200 for each count; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People, we find that it was sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
