1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 851 F.2d
  5. 851 F.2d 348 (1988)
 

HEMSTREET v. SPIEGEL, INC.

No. 88-1152.

851 F.2d 348 (1988)

Harold S. HEMSTREET, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SPIEGEL, INC., Defendant, Recognition Equipment Incorporated, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 7, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard M. Ring, Leonard M. Ring and Associates, Chicago, Ill., argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Edward D. Manzo, Jenner and Block, Chicago, Ill.

John W. Stack, Winston and Strawn, Chicago, Ill., argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Edward J. Wendrow.

Before FRIEDMAN, RICH and NEWMAN, Circuit Judges.

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois that refused to relieve the appellant of its obligation under the court's prior order settling a patent infringement suit to make royalty payments to the appellee. We affirm.

I

In 1977, the appellee Hemstreet filed a patent infringement suit against Spiegel, Inc. (which no longer is in the case) and the appellant Recognition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases