1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 519 So.2d
  5. 519 So.2d 676 (1988)
 

PURE FRESH ENTER., INC. v. DIV. OF ALC. BEVERAGES & TOBACCO

No. 87-1048.

519 So.2d 676 (1988)

PURE FRESH ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Ponderosa Pub, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

January 22, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Curtis, of Allsworth, Doumar, Cazel & Curtis, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

W. Douglas Moody, Staff Atty., Tallahassee, Dept. of Business Regulation, for appellee.

ON APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR REMAND

PER CURIAM.

The initial brief in this administrative appeal argues that the fairness of the proceedings and the correctness of the final order have been impaired by a material error in procedure. Appellant's counsel represents that he was not served a copy of a hearing officer's recommended order and that the first counsel knew of its existence was when a final order was received adopting the recommended order.

In...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases