1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 758 P.2d
  5. 758 P.2d 435 (1988)
 

UNITED FOAM CORP. v. WHIDDON

WCB Nos. 85-14081; 85-14106; CA A46136.

758 P.2d 435 (1988)

92 Or.App. 492

In the matter of the Compensation of Charles H. Whiddon, Claimant. UNITED FOAM CORP., Petitioner — Cross-Respondent, v. Charles H. WHIDDON, Respondent — Cross-Petitioner, Bertsech Mobil and Saif Corporation, Respondents — Cross-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 10, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patric J. Doherty and E. Kimbark MacColl, Jr., Portland, for motion.

Robert K. Udziela, and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland, on respondent — cross-petitioner's response to motion.

Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem, for respondents — cross-respondents.

Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and WARREN, J.

On Petitioner — Cross-Respondent's Motion for Remand April 8, 1988.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has moved for a remand to the Workers' Compensation Board for consideration of new evidence. SAIF objects on the ground that the law does not provide for a remand.

Before the effective date of Or. Laws 1987, ch. 844, § 12(a), ORS 656.298(6) read:

"The court may remand the case to the referee for further evidence taking, correction or other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases