Ordered that the judgment is affirmed and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The defendant claims that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress all of the statements he made after his arrest for violations of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. However, at the trial, the defendant's counsel specifically limited the suppression motion to certain tape-recorded conversations. Thus, the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
