ZIZAK v. DESPATCH INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. C0-88-1070.

427 N.W.2d 755 (1988)

Paul ZIZAK, Relator, v. DESPATCH INDUSTRIES, INC., Minneapolis Commission on Civil Rights, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied October 26, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Brenner, Minneapolis, for Zizak, relator.

Mary Anne Colovic, Frederikson & Byron, Minneapolis, for Despatch Industries, Inc., respondent.

Robert Alfton, Minneapolis City Atty., Allen Hyatt, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for Minneapolis Com'n on Civ. Rights, respondent.

Considered at Special Term and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and PARKER and SCHUMACHER, JJ., without oral argument.


SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Paul Zizak claimed he was not promoted, as a result of age discrimination. The executive director of respondent commission found no probable cause to sustain the charge. Zizak appealed to a three-member review panel, which sustained the director's determination. Zizak sought certiorari review in the Court of Appeals. Respondent-employer, Despatch Industries, moved to discharge the writ, asserting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases