YORK v. TATE

Nos. 87-3834, 87-3835.

858 F.2d 322 (1988)

Jeffrey YORK, Petitioner-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Arthur TATE, Respondent-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided September 28, 1988.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing November 10, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. O'Connell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, Cordelia Glenn (argued), for respondent-appellant, cross-appellee.

Paul Mancino, Jr. (argued), Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.

Before MILBURN, GUY and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from the district court's order granting habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, we are called upon to consider the proper application of the constitutional standard used for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence presented in a state court criminal prosecution resulting in a conviction. In Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the Supreme Court instructed federal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases