1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 758 P.2d
  5. 758 P.2d 410 (1988)
 

EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT v. FOPPO

ERB UP-74-87; CA A45663.

758 P.2d 410 (1988)

92 Or.App. 331

State of Oregon, EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT, Respondent, v. FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry H. Drummonds, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Kulongoski, Durham, Drummonds & Colombo, Portland.

Rives Kistler, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and GRABER, JJ.

GRABER, Judge.

The Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers (FOPPO) seeks review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). The order requires FOPPO to "cease and desist from refusing to bargain in good faith over the subject of longevity [pay] steps." We reverse.

FOPPO is the collective bargaining representative for state parole and probation officers. ORS 243.650(12). The state is a public employer. ORS 243.650(18). The

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases