REBECCA WIGHTMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 12, 1988.
July 12, 1988.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, Barry L. Bunshoft, Patricia Shuler Shimbor, Vito C. Peraino, and Ray L. Wong for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Mary C. Michel, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Respondents.
Gerald F. Sevier, District Attorney, Gary E. Evans and John S. Higgins, Jr., Deputy District Attorneys, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
OPINION
WHITE, P.J. —
I
Introduction
By this taxpayers' action (Code Civ. Proc., § 526a),1 appellants Rebecca Wightman (Wightman), Claude Malcolm Thompson (Thompson), and Jacqueline Jackson (Jackson) challenge the withholding of their state income tax refunds by respondents Franchise Tax Board (FTB) and the State Controller2 pursuant to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.