STOVALL v. SALLY SALMON SEAFOOD

WCB 84-13447, 85-01254; CA A38730; SC S33962.

757 P.2d 410 (1988)

306 Or. 25

In the matter of the Compensation of Pamela R. STOVALL, Claimant. Pamela R. Stovall, Respondent On Review, v. SALLY SALMON SEAFOOD and Ebi Companies, Respondents On Review, and Hallmark Fisheries and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Petitioners On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided June 7, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Roess, Coos Bay, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioners on review.

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent on review Stovall. With him on the response to the petition were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Craig Staples, Portland, argued the cause for respondents on review Sally Salmon Seafood and EBI Companies. On the response to the petition were Jerald P. Keene and Roberts, Reinisch & Klor, P.C., Portland.


LENT, Justice.

The first issue is which of two successive employers is responsible for payment of workers' compensation for claimant's occupational disease, carpal tunnel syndrome. Working conditions at both employers could have caused the disease. Claimant first became disabled from the disease while working for the second employer and first sought medical treatment during that second employment. She would not have required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases