OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant seeks relief from an order denying his request for an evidentiary hearing and modification in custody under the two-year waiting period required by Minn. Stat. § 518.18(b).
Appellant argues that because his previous motion was denied without an evidentiary hearing, the prior motion was never decided on its merits.
FACTS
The marriage of appellant Paul Richard Davis and respondent Kathleen...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.