REDGATE v. SROGA'S STANDARD SERVICE

Nos. CX-87-1759, C1-87-1763.

421 N.W.2d 729 (1988)

Bruce REDGATE, Respondent, v. SROGA'S STANDARD SERVICE and American Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents (CX-87-1759), Relators (C1-87-1763), New Hope Foods/Hardee's and Garlington Group, Relators (CX-87-1759), Respondents (C1-87-1763).

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. McClenahan, Minneapolis, for Hardee's and Garlington Group.

Roderick C. Cosgritt, Minneapolis, for Sroga's Standard Service and American Mut. Ins. Co., relators C1-87-1763.

Lorrie L. Bescheinen, Minneapolis, for Bruce Redgate.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

This case raises the issue whether, under post-1983 law, an injured employee who has not reached maximum medical improvement, must make a diligent search for light duty work to receive temporary total disability benefits. We hold there is a diligent search requirement and that the evidence supports the compensation judge's finding that no diligent search was made in this case. We reverse the contrary rulings of the Workers' Compensation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases