1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 758 P.2d
  5. 758 P.2d 389 (1988)
 

HARRINGTON v. WARLICK

A8508-5299; CA A41364.

758 P.2d 389 (1988)

92 Or.App. 279

Robert E. HARRINGTON, Appellant, v. Harold F. WARLICK, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 3, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary M. Bullock, Portland, argued the cause and submitted the briefs for appellant.

E. Andrew Jordan, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Bolliger, Hampton & Tarlow, Portland.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

WARDEN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment1 awarding defendant attorney fees pursuant to the terms of a promissory note. We reverse that part of the judgment.2

Plaintiff brought an action on a promissory note, seeking principal, interest and attorney fees pursuant to its terms. He moved for summary judgment but, before the motion was heard,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases