BERLINER v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY

WCB 85-12191; CA A43382.

758 P.2d 384 (1988)

92 Or.App. 264

In the matter of the Compensation of Dennis BERLINER, Claimant. Dennis Berliner, Petitioner, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 3, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Paul Roess, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Foss, Whitty & Roess, Coos Bay.

Before WARDEN, P.J., and JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.


JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

This case is before us after a remand to the referee for evidence taking. Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser, 90 Or.App. 450, 752 P.2d 1246 (1988). The initial issue is whether the Workers' Compensation Board had authority to republish its October 8, 1986, order. We conclude that the Board had that authority and that, therefore, we have jurisdiction. On the merits, we affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases