PEOPLE v. HUDY


73 N.Y.2d 40 (1988)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrick Hudy, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 22, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Saitta for appellant.

Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney (Kevin P. Dooley of counsel), for respondent.

Judges KAYE, ALEXANDER and HANCOCK, JR., concur with Judge TITONE; Judge ALEXANDER concurs in a separate opinion; Chief Judge WACHTLER dissents and votes to affirm in another opinion in which Judges SIMONS and BELLACOSA concur.


TITONE, J.

In 1984, the Legislature repealed the statutory provisions requiring corroboration of the victim's testimony in certain sex-crime prosecutions involving underage victims (L 1984, ch 89, amending Penal Law former §§ 130.16, 260.11). We now hold that the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution (US Const, art I, § 10; see also, art I, § 9, cl 3) does not preclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases