1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 683 F.Supp.
  5. 683 F.Supp. 449 (1988)
 

U.S. v. BORTNOVSKY

No. 88 Cr. 71 (MBM).

683 F.Supp. 449 (1988)

UNITED STATES of America, v. Alexander BORTNOVSKY a/k/a Sasha and Leonid Braz, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 26, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Cleary, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for U.S.

Joel Winograd, New York City, for Bortnovsky.

Michael H. Soroka, Stein & Garr, New York City, for Braz.

OPINION AND ORDER

MUKASEY, District Judge.

The defendants have moved to dismiss Counts Three through Eight of the indictment as barred by the statute of limitations because the indictment was not returned within five years of the commission of the acts constituting the underlying offenses.1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.

I.

These defendants and one other were charged initially in indictment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases