LEY v. DALL

No. 88-076.

553 A.2d 562 (1988)

Edith LEY v. William A. DALL, D.D.S.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold E. Eaton, Jr. of Miller, Cleary & Faignant, Rutland, for petitioner.

Norman Cohen, Rutland, for respondent.

Before ALLEN, C.J., PECK, GIBSON and DOOLEY, JJ., and BARNEY, C.J. (Ret.), Specially Assigned.


DOOLEY, Justice.

Defendant in an action against him for dental malpractice brings this petition for extraordinary relief, pursuant to V.R.A.P. 21. He seeks relief from the Rutland Superior Court's order granting plaintiff's motion to compel defendant to answer interrogatories relating to prior malpractice claims against him. We deny defendant's petition because of his failure to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion or usurped its judicial power...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases