DORGE v. UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 880167.

762 P.2d 347 (1988)

Fred DORGE, Petitioner, v. The UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred Dorge, Salt Lake City, pro se.

David L. Wilkinson, Sandra L. Sjogren, Carlie Christensen, Salt Lake City, for respondent.


DURHAM, Justice:

Petitioner has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to the Court of Appeals to require it to reinstate his appeal from a criminal conviction in that court. That appeal was dismissed for failure to amend a deficient docketing statement and to either request a transcript or file a notice that a transcript was not required, in violation of rules 9 and 11(e) of the Rules of the Utah Court of Appeals.

Petitioner might have, but has not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases