HEIDEN v. DON POLLOCK INVESTMENTS

WCB 86-01669; CA A45336.

762 P.2d 346 (1988)

93 Or.App. 425

In the matter of the Compensation of James G. HEIDEN, Claimant. James G. Heiden, Petitioner, v. DON POLLOCK INVESTMENTS and Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 12, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emerson G. Fisher, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Garry L. Kahn, P.C., Portland.

Mildren J. Carmack, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that reduced the permanent partial disability awarded by the referee. The petition for review was filed after July 20, 1987, and our review is as specified in ORS 656.298. See Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200, 752 P.2d 312 (1988).

The Board's order is insufficient for effective review. It...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases