NEIHART v. ROSEBURG LUMBER CO.

WCB 85-13216; CA A42468.

752 P.2d 353 (1988)

90 Or.App. 432

In the matter of the Compensation of Ward NEIHART, Claimant. Ward Neihart, Petitioner, v. ROSEBURG LUMBER COMPANY AND INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 13, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Karen M. Werner and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

H. Scott Plouse, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.


PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that reversed the referee and reinstated the insurer's denial of compensability of certain proposed surgical procedures. After the Board issued its order, the surgical procedures were performed. We allowed the record to be supplemented by new evidence relating to the surgeries and claimant's post-operative condition. Because the new evidence could affect the issue of whether the surgical procedures...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases