1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 839 F.2d
  5. 839 F.2d 263 (1988)
 

DANIEL v. EATON CORP.

No. 86-5664.

839 F.2d 263 (1988)

Charles DANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EATON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided February 9, 1988.

On Motion for Reconsideration March 17, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hollis L. Searcy, argued, Richard L. Masters, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiff-appellant.

John T. Ballantine, David A. Harris, Ogden, Robertson and Marshall, Louisville, Ky., Harry T. Quick, argued, Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan & Aronoff, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, KENNEDY, Circuit Judge, and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.

LIVELY, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, Charles Daniel, appeals from a judgment of the district court denying his demand for early retirement benefits from his former employer, defendant Eaton Corporation (Eaton). Because of the unsatisfactory state of the district court record, and procedural missteps, we must remand the case for further proceedings.

I.

Daniel was first hired by Shuler Axle Company of Louisville, Kentucky (Shuler) on January 5, 1953...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases