STATE v. PRITCHETT

87-CR-0171-WE; CA A45111.

752 P.2d 331 (1988)

90 Or.App. 342

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Timothy Emmett PRITCHETT, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 6, 1988.

Review Denied May 24, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marsha Mussehl, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

This criminal case raises the question of whether the trial court erred in entering separate convictions for burglary and rape and imposing consecutive sentences. We conclude that there was no error and affirm.

The original indictment charged rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual penetration with a foreign object, kidnapping in the first degree and burglary in the first degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to rape in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases