Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant moved to suppress statements he made to police officers on the ground that they had been taken in violation of his right to counsel. The suppression court properly denied defendant's motion. Defendant failed to show that either police officer witness had actual knowledge of an outstanding, prior criminal charge at the time defendant was interrogated; therefore, he failed to prove that the officers were under...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
