COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. v. ICC

Nos. 1-88-1437, 1-88-1833, 1-88-2030, 1-88-2231 cons.

180 Ill. App.3d 899 (1988)

536 N.E.2d 724

COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Respondents-Appellees. — CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Respondents-Appellees. — COMMUNITY ACTION FOR FAIR UTILITY PRACTICE et al., Petitioners-Appellants, v. THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Respondents-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois — First District (1st Division).

Rehearing denied January 30, 1989.

Modified opinion filed February 14, 1989.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Graham, Howard J. Trienens, and Michael I. Miller, all of Sidley & Austin, of Chicago, for Commonwealth Edison Company.

Robert L. Graham, Norman M. Hirsch, and Stuart M. Gimbel, all of Jenner & Block, of Chicago, for Citizens Utility Board.

Allen W. Cherry and James Biggs, both of Legal Assistance Foundation, of Chicago, for South Austin Coalition Community Council, Community Action for Fair Utility Practice, and National People's Action.

Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, of Chicago (Glenn C. Carr and Jack A. Pace, Assistant State's Attorneys, of counsel), for People of Cook County.

Neil F. Hartigan, Attorney General, of Springfield, and Office of Public Counsel, of Chicago (Michael J. Kelly, Karen L. Lusson, and Joan G. Fickinger, Assistant Attorneys General, of Chicago, and Stephen J. Moore and Thomas H. Rowland, of counsel), for the People.

Clyde Kurlander, Edward P. O'Brien, and John P. Kelliher, all of Illinois Commerce Commission, of Chicago, for respondent Illinois Commerce Commission.


Order affirmed in 1-88-1437; order reversed in 1-88-1833, 1-88-2030, 1-88-2231.

JUSTICE O'CONNOR delivered the opinion of the court:

In this consolidated case, Commonwealth Edison Company is petitioning for a review of the order by the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission) of April 27, 1988 (docket No. 86-0128), previously stayed by this court. That order reduced the seasonal differential for residential rates by decreasing summer charges and increasing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases