1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 365 S.E.2d
  5. 365 S.E.2d 712 (1988)
 

SHUPING v. BARBER

No. 8719SC611.

365 S.E.2d 712 (1988)

Jimmy L. SHUPING v. James D. BARBER, Michael Coates and City of Salisbury, North Carolina.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Patterson, Follin, Curtis, James and Harkavy by Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, for plaintiff-appellant.

Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge and Rice by Charles F. Vance, Jr., and Gusti W. Frankel, Winston-Salem, for defendants-appellees.

PARKER, Judge.

On the sole issue raised in this appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for defendants for the reason that the statements allegedly made by the individual defendants were actionable per se and defendants' affirmative defenses of privileged communication and governmental immunity are not a bar to plaintiff's claim.

Summary judgment is appropriate when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases