BRYANT v. EAGAN

No. 8721SC735.

364 S.E.2d 704 (1988)

George A. BRYANT, Jr., and Nancy M. Bryant, Plaintiffs, v. John T. EAGAN, Jr., Ronald A. Matamoros, Mary M. Eagan, Waterford—A Partnership, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 16, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George A. Bryant, Jr., appearing pro se, Winston-Salem, for plaintiffs, appellants.

Petree Stockton & Robinson by Daniel R. Taylor, Jr., Winston-Salem & Raleigh, and James P. Cain, Raleigh, for defendants, appellees.


HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs' sole contention on appeal is the trial court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. It is a fundamental principle of law that summary judgment should be granted only when the materials submitted to the court establish that there is no genuine issue as to a material fact and that a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Parker Marking Systems, Inc. v. Diagraph-Bradley Industries, Inc., 80 N.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases