1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 861 F.2d
  5. 861 F.2d 203 (1988)
 

INTERSTATE FIRE & CAS. CO. v. STUNTMAN INC.

No. 87-5655.

861 F.2d 203 (1988)

INTERSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STUNTMAN INC.; Hal Needham, Heidi Von Beltz, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 5, 1988.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing November 7, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack M. Staitman, Staitman & Snyder, Encino, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Harvey A. Schneider and Steven W. Murray, Encino, Cal., for defendants-appellees Stuntman, Inc., and Hal Needham.

Haskell J. Shapiro and Belli & Sabih, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant-appellee Heidi von Beltz.

Before PREGERSON, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants Stuntman, Inc., et al. on the ground that the district court misinterpreted certain provisions of the excess commercial liability policy it issued to Stuntman. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In August 1979, Interstate issued an excess insurance policy to Stuntman, the company providing stunt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases