IN RE PAOLI R.R. YARD PCB LITIGATION

Civ. A. Nos. 86-2229, 86-2235, 86-2669, 86-4037, 86-4723, 86-5277, 86-5886, 86-7414, 86-7415 to 86-7422, 86-7561, 87-0712, 87-1190, 87-1258, 87-2874, 87-3227, 87-5269 and 87-5304.

706 F.Supp. 358 (1988)

In re PAOLI RAILROAD YARD PCB LITIGATION. Mabel BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. BURRELL v. SEPTA, et al. CUMMINS v. SEPTA, et al. COHEN & GARON v. SEPTA, et al. THOMPSON v. SEPTA, et al. JONES v. SEPTA, et al. LAMENT v. SEPTA, et al. Christopher BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Cathlene BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Craig BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. BARBETTA v. SEPTA, et al. JOHNSON v. SEPTA, et al. Celeste BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Clemmon BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Cloyd BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. Curtis BROWN v. SEPTA, et al. INGRAM v. SEPTA, et al. KNIGHT v. SEPTA, et al. NARCISE v. SEPTA, et al. WILLIAMS v. SEPTA, et al. BUTLER v. SEPTA, et al. STANBACH v. SEPTA, et al. CUNNINGHAM v. SEPTA, et al. REID v. SEPTA, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

November 28, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold E. Cohen, Charlotte E. Thomas, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg, Ellers & Weir, Joseph C. Kohn, Kohn, Savett, Klein & Graf, D. Bruce Hanes, Philadelphia, Pa., James C. Sargent, Lamb, Windle & McErlane, West Chester, Pa., Geoffrey L. Beauchamp, Wisler, Pearlstine, Talone, Craig & Garrity, Norristown, Pa., Joseph M. Donley and Kenneth A. Roos, Kittredge, Kaufman & Donley, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiffs.

Roger F. Cox, Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley, Philadelphia, Pa., for SEPTA.

David Richman, Pepper, Hamilton & Sheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., for Conrail.

Richard A. Kraemer, Margolis, Edestein, Scherlis, Sarowitz & Kraemer, Philadelphia, Pa., for Amtrak.

Michael H. Malin, White & Williams, Philadelphia, Pa., for Monsanto.

Harry A. Short, Liebert, Short, Fitzpatrick & Hirshland, Philadelphia, Pa., for G.E.

Denise D. Colliers, Deputy City Sol., Philadelphia, Pa., for City of Philadelphia.


MEMORANDUM

ROBERT F. KELLY, District Judge.

This memorandum is written in disposition of three summary judgment motions filed by the defendants in these actions. FACTS

Since the 1930s, the twenty-three acre Paoli railyard has been a regional maintenance facility for various rail companies. The railyard was owned and operated by the Pennsylvania Railroad and its successor, the Penn Central Transportation Company, until 1976. Defendant Amtrak has owned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases