1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 364 S.E.2d
  5. 364 S.E.2d 700 (1988)
 

PATTON v. PATTON

No. 8714DC838.

364 S.E.2d 700 (1988)

Shirley PATTON v. David E. PATTON.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 16, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maxwell, Freeman & Beason, P.A. by James B. Maxwell, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Clayton, Myrick, McClanahan & Coulter by Robert W. Myrick and Robert D. McClanahan, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Defendant first argues the trial court again failed to make a sufficient finding of fact as to the value of defendant's interest in his closely-held corporation. In Patton v. Patton, 318 N.C. 404, 348 S.E.2d 593 (1986), the Supreme Court held that the finding of fact should be more than a mere enumeration of the factors considered by the trial court in determining the value of defendant's interest. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases