1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 431 N.W.2d
  5. 431 N.W.2d 629 (1988)
 

GARZA v. MAACO AUTO PAINTING & BODYWORKS

No. 87-195.

431 N.W.2d 629 (1988)

230 Neb. 341

Pete GARZA, Appellant v. MAACO AUTO PAINTING AND BODYWORKS, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

November 18, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pete Garza, pro se.

Craig G. Ongley, of Schmid, Mooney & Frederick, P.C., Omaha, for appellee.

BOSLAUGH, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ., and ENDACOTT and QUIST, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This pro se appeal arises out of an action for damages in which plaintiff, Pete Garza, contended that defendant, Maaco Auto Painting and Bodyworks, failed to repair his automobile in accordance with their agreement. Garza also claimed that Maaco made certain misrepresentations upon which he relied, to his detriment. Maaco counterclaimed for the agreed price of the repairs. Following a bench trial, the court dismissed Garza's petition and entered judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases