Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Defendant contends that the suppression court erred in failing to suppress both his oral statements and written confession to the police because the police had knowledge of an unrelated charge pending against him. Since defendant told the police that his prior criminal case had been resolved, his oral statements were properly admitted (see, People v Lucarano
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.